Today, I share a few choice thoughts on hope from Thomas Merton. These are from "Sentences on Hope,"
No Man Is an Island:
But the pride of those who live as if they believed they were better than anyone else is rooted in a secret failure to believe in their own goodness.
Only the man who has had to face despair is really convinced that he needs mercy. Those who do not want mercy never seek it. It is better to find God on the threshold of despair than to risk our lives in a complacency that has never felt the need of forgiveness. A life that is without problems may literally be more hopeless than one that always verges on despair.
The faith that tells me God wills all men to be saved must be completed by the hope that God wills me to be saved, and by the love that responds to His desire and seals my hope with conviction. Thus hope offers the substance of all theology to the individual soul. By hope all the truths that are presented to the whole world in an abstract and impersonal way become for me a matter of personal and intimate conviction.
God bless Thomas Merton. These thoughts on hope express well the thoughts I sometimes have when I observe university students wrestling with the question of the existence of God. I especially think that this is provocative: "A life without problems may literally be more hopeless than one that always verges on despair."
Is that overly dramatic of Merton to say? I don't think so. So many people--and I'm mainly thinking of the students--have not experienced a suffering that has caused them to seek radical mercy. At the University of Michigan, there is, on the whole, a lack of certain types of experiential, deeply personal suffering. Students are educated, bright, capable, responsible, diligent, and many of them have monetary wealth. They're young and in great physical condition. What does the path to belief look like for one who is in possession of all this? Even us who are Christians constantly face the temptation of being in rather than of the world when we come into possession of some of the aforementioned things and so we, at the encouragement of Christ, forsake them.
The cost of having all of these things can oftentimes be a temptation to self-reliance and a belief that one can live their life without Him. Merton expresses this well in the first quote I gave: "The pride of those who live as if they believed they were better than anyone else is rooted in a secret failure to believe in their own goodness." What defines one's "goodness" if intelligence, health, money, and talents do not?
In dictionary.com, "goodness" is defined as:
-moral excellence, virtue
-kindness, generosity
-excellent of quality
-the best part of anything, essence, strength
So, to the world, being "good" means being moral, generous, excellent at things one does, being strong, and being the best. But here's the thing: only God fully embodies all of these qualities: He alone is Virtue, Kindness Itself, and Generous, Excellent, the Best, and Strength. I think that sometimes, we can misunderstand the heart of what God says about our identity. Our egos are so easily offended when we are forced to admit that we are not the source of our own goodness. Of course we are all of these things that the dictionary lists; we were created in His image and likeness.
God is our Father, and so we've inherited and reflect His goodness. What child with blonde hair would make this claim: "I am fully responsible for the blonde-ness of my hair, I and I alone. I pat myself on the back because I have blonde hair, and I like it." This would be absurdity. It was a matter of genes; the child inherited her blonde hair from someone. The same is true for our good spiritual qualities: they are a matter of spiritual genes. To deny this is to deny the relationship we have with our Father. This is the primary offense: we deny that God's love for us created us and placed us in relationship with Him.
Suffering and moments of self-realization of our shortcomings force us to question how those have come to happen. Thus some people come to believe that God is actually bad, evil, manipulative, and maniacal. They see expressions of what is bad and evil in others, the world, and themselves, and they think that these things have been passed along via the genes of a bad god. The assertion that we--and the Devil, one who also denied his relationship with his Creator--might be responsible for the evils in the world is overwhelming and is our blind spot. If a driver of a car hits a pedestrian who is crossing the road and who has the right of way, who is responsible for the death of the pedestrian? The driver who has a blind spot or the pedestrian? The question of the existence of God, I think, sometimes comes down to a matter of whether we can believe that we have a blind spot, and that this blind spot causes harm. Even if we have experienced a meagre amount of personal suffering, of being sinned against by the world or others, can we admit that we are capable of hurting others? The first step is admitting that we may have harmed others and thus ourselves--and then, ultimately, God.
I close with brief reflection on the third Merton quote: "The faith that tells me that God wills all men to be saved must be completed by the hope that God wills me to be saved..." Faith is incomplete when we only see the needs of others. To believe that only those without food or clothes are in real need is insufficient faith. We all suffer from spiritual poverty, a poverty of the heart. As Merton says, the first person's needs we need to see is our own, our own heart poverty. We need to see our own need for God, and that will change the way we see everything.
For we are saved by hope. But hope that is seen is not hope. For what a man seeth, why doth he hope for?
-Romans 8: 24